DataBase - Access 2003 --- Access 2007 Runtime Conflict

Asked By Brad
30-Dec-09 11:11 AM
Background

Several people at our firm in Department ???A??? use Access 2003 to work with an
older Access 2003 Database.  This system has worked nicely for several years.

We have built a new system for Department ???B???.  The people in this
department use Access 2007 Runtime.  This works nicely for them.

Recently a person in Department ???A??? wanted to use a component of the Access
2007 system that was build for Department ???B???.  We downloaded Access 2007
Runtime for this person.  They now can use the new Access 2007 System ??? This
works nicely??? however???

The Problem...

Each time the person in Department ???A??? uses the new Access 2007 system (via
Runtime), they receive a message ???Please wait while Windows Configures
Microsoft Office Access Runtime???.  After using Access 2007 Runtime they
receive a similar message when they use the older Access 2003 system.

(In other words, this PC has both Access 2003 and Access 2007 Runtime
installed on it).

I suggested that we use Access 2007 Runtime for both the old system and the
new system.  Unfortunately, the user needs the Access 2003 ???task bar??? to do
their job.  This is not shown with Access 2007 Runtime.

Is there a way to eliminate the ???Please wait while Windows Configures??????
message as the user goes between the old Access 2003 application and the new
Access 2007 Runtime application?  (This reconfiguration takes about 30
seconds to complete)

Is there a way to overcome this dilemma?

Thanks for your help,

Brad
Access 2007
(1)
Access 2003
(1)
Windows 7
(1)
Office
(1)
XP
(1)
TWickerath
(1)
SageKey
(1)
Configures
(1)
  Tom Wickerath replied to Brad
30-Dec-09 02:42 PM
Hi Brad,

This reconfiguration is a known problem. There are two ways that I know of
to avoid this problem. The first is to install the runtime in a virtual
machine, with a guest operating system, that is completely isolated from a
host machine. The second method involves using SageKey software:

http://www.sagekey.com/installation_access.aspx


Tom Wickerath
Microsoft Access MVP
http://www.accessmvp.com/TWickerath/
__________________________________________
  Brad replied to Tom Wickerath
30-Dec-09 08:46 PM
Tom,

Thanks for your assistance.  I really appreciate the help.

Unforunately, neither of these two options sound real appealing (limited
budget, limited time).

We will probably continue to look for another approach.

Thanks again,

Brad
  Tom Wickerath replied to Brad
30-Dec-09 10:51 PM
Hi Brad,


Okay, I just thought of a third possibility: Get a different computer.
Otherwise, just live with the situation. There is already been lots of people
spend tons of time on addressing this very issue (and only the folks at
SageKey seem to have hit on the solution).


Tom Wickerath
Microsoft Access MVP
http://www.accessmvp.com/TWickerath/
__________________________________________
  David W. Fenton replied to Brad
30-Dec-09 11:48 PM
Then you are really out of luck, as there are no other solutions for
running the two versions of Access on the same computer.

And, yes, it is quite annoying. I often avoid answering A2007
questions because my daily work is in A2003 and do not want to have
to wait through the reconfiguration delays that would be necessitaed
by firing up A2007 to investigate an answer.

--
David W. Fenton                  http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com    http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
  Brad replied to David W. Fenton
31-Dec-09 12:13 PM
David,

Thanks for your insight.

One of my concerns is that I really do not know what the "re-config" is doing
behind the scenes.  I think that we can live with it as long as we are sure
that it is not going to mess something up by being done over and over.

Brad
  David W. Fenton replied to Brad
31-Dec-09 04:14 PM
it is changing a lot of registry settings for the canonical version
of Access that handles the Access file association. That is, it
reconfigures the registry to point to a particular version of Access
that will be the one executed when, for example, you doubleclick and
MDB in Windows Explorer. it is substantially more complicated than
that, but that is the basic idea of what it is doing.


If it is happening in sequence, it is not an issue, but if you have
one version open and then open the other one while keeping the
initial version open, it can cause problems in the first instance,
because the environment its running in is different. I do not run
both very often, but I have had the situation where leaving A2003 open
while running A2007 caused the reconfiguration to A2007 as canonical
Access version caused A2003 to start behaving strangely (symptoms
that were similar to those of missing references). The solution was
to close both and restart A2003.

it is quite annoying that Microsoft does not think this is important
to fix, but we have had this issue since the introduction of the
Microsoft Installer in A2000, and I doubt it is ever going to be
fixed -- it seems to suit Microsoft's agenda, which just so happens
to be in conflict with the needs of many of us who have to run
multiple versions.

--
David W. Fenton                  http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com    http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
  Armen Stein replied to Tom Wickerath
31-Dec-09 07:10 PM
I know it probably does not solve the OP's problem, because I doubt if
their company is ready for Windows 7, but...

Has anyone tried Windows 7's Virtual XP mode for earlier versions of
Access?  Couldn't you install the Access 2003 version in that,
effectively running it in a window on a different VM without the
configuration hassles?

Armen Stein
Microsoft Access MVP
www.JStreetTech.com
  Brad replied to David W. Fenton
31-Dec-09 07:35 PM
David,

Thanks for the info, I appreciate it.  Anything that changes the registry on
a possible frequent basis scares me a bit, especially in an environment where
an end-user may have multiple copies of both Access 2003 and Access 2007
running at the same time.

I am now thinking that we will go through the work to get everyone running
on Access 2007 Runtime sooner rather than later.  This is going to take some
work but it is doable.

Thanks again for your insights.

Brad
Create New Account
help
DataBase 2010: Essential Diffs? Sounds like Access 2010 is something of a different animal from preceding versions. Could anybody generalize the big issues? - - PeteCresswell One starting point would be to browse Access team's blog. http: / / blogs.msdn.com / access / default.aspx Click on "2010 Intro Series" tag, which is high on the top of Perhaps the big news is the new version of VBA, or what we call VBA 7. This new version of VBA now has a true pointer data type called longPtr. We and of course we get a 64 bit version of the jet engine (now since 2007 called ACE - for the remainder this article I am going to use the term JET new version of VBA of course is also runs on the 32 bit version of windows. -> Database triggers and stored procedures: New for 2010 in jet is table events and table code will run and fire. In fact you do not even have to have a Access installed on your computer. This is a true engine level store procedure and trigger system. If you attempt to open accdb file in access 2007 and you have table code attached as events, you will get a warning message
DataBase Considerations migrating from Access 97 mdb to Access 2003 (or up)? What are the things I need to watch for? I know about linked sheet properties and Sandboxing mode and making sure to run Jet 4.0 SP8 for 2003 but what else should I look for? We're kind of at the end of the road (so it seems) with Access 97. It does not play well with Windows 7 Professional even in XP Mode, the application is crashy / unsreponsive at times. I figure moving up to a more
Access 2010 32-bit runtime installation error with 64-bit office DataBase Hi, How do I resolve this??!! We have a client trying to install our runtime application created with Access 2010 32-bit and she is receiving this error: 'You cannot install the 32-bit version of Office 2010 because you have 64-bit Office products installed. These 64-bit products are not supported with 32-bit installations: Microsoft Office Publisher 2010; Microsoft Office Single Image 2010. If you want to install 32-bit Office 2010, you must uninstall all 64-bit Office products first, and then run setup.exe
DataBase Win 7 virtual store question (with Access 2003) Hi, We just had a client's PC crashed so he took it to a dbpath = CurrentDb.TableDefs("tblclients").Connect Me.txtdatahome = Mid(dbpath, 11) Some clients with Vista and Windows 7 have their data in the Program Files folder (Where our application get's installed) and then I always ensure I follow the standards that MS has been suggesting since before Windows 2000. And that is do not use Program Files to store the data and or user updatable files. This includes the Access FE because Access updates it as you work with it. You should be using the My Documents folder
vor allem f?r die regulars hier, in das deutsch-sprachige usenet umzuziehen? F?r Access gibt es de.comp.datenbanken.ms-access f?r Word + Excel g?be es de.comp.office-pakete.ms-office ganz logisch ist es nicht, aber ich wei? nicht, ob man so schnell eine ?nderung siehst Du, dass in dieser Gruppe (2009) nur noch 30% von dem Volumen in 2001-2003 geschieht. Die Schl?sse daraus k?nnten folgende (und / oder) sein: a) Die Fragen sind beantwortet - der User findet es per Google schon selbst. Google war 2001-2003 noch nicht so bedeutend, und die Groups-Suche wurde evtl. auch erst dann m?glich Herber, Online-Excel usw. - - Moin+Gruss Alexander - MVP for MS Excel - www.xxcl.de - mso2000sp3 - -7-2 . . . . . . die haben aber nur ein relativ begrenztes Sortiment und m?ssen nur Ihre Anwendungsprogramme com / MicrosoftForums St??t aber nicht unbedingt auf positiven Widerhall, vor allem nicht in den Windows-NGs. - - Gru? Herrand Hallo, Es gibt die NNTP-Bridge, die du auf deinem Rechner installieren