DataBase - Missing list links for GP in GP
Asked By Joel Pettigrew
08-Jan-10 04:49 PM
Going into GP I am going into the Alternate/Modified Forms and Reports and I
select the ID. I then select the product Microsoft Dynamics GP and it never
populates the links.
I am running this directly from the server since one of the clients is
actually having a different issue. Specs are Windows 2000 and the initial
problem we were trying to fix was described as: "There is also an error when
I go to get into bank reconciliation, because when I was in there about two
months ago my computer crashed. It is saying to use Check Links window to
check links on the Cm Logical files. "
Blogster
(1)
Windows
(1)
Databases
(1)
Months
(1)
MSDGP
(1)
PMP
(1)
Mariano Gomez replied to Joel Pettigrew
And by "links" should we understand your modified forms and reports? If this
is the case, then this workstation may not be pointing to the correct
forms/reports dictionaries. Check the settings by editing your DYNAMICS.SET
file and looking at the path for the FORMS.DIC and REPORTS.DIC files. If the
path is incorrect, change it accordingly with the actual location of the
files.
As for the issue with the client, backup your DYNAMICS and company
databases, and run the Check Links as suggested by the application.
If you are not comfortable with any of the above suggestions, please email
me to discuss more options. Use the contact information below.
Best regards,
--
MG.-
Mariano Gomez, MIS, MCP, PMP
Maximum Global Business, LLC
http://www.maximumglobalbusiness.com
The Dynamics GP Blogster at http://dynamicsgpblogster.blogspot.com
Joel Pettigrew replied to Joel Pettigrew
Also I should make note that other fields still work.
The All Programs selection populates the folder choice.
Human Resources selection populates the folder choice.
Its only when I select Microsoft Dynamics GP that it doesnt ever fill in the
blank white space with anything.
Thanks for any help.
Joel Pettigrew replied to Mariano Gomez
Yes, that is correct. We are actually missing the Form.dic file in the data
folder. The set file is pointing to it but it is missing. Is there a
location on the install cd or online to obtain that dictionary file?
Thanks,
Joel
Mariano Gomez replied to Joel Pettigrew
Ok, now that you have identified that the FORMS.DIC dictionary file is
missing, the question is, does this happen on other workstations? Meaning, is
there a workstation where you can go to MSDGP >> Tools >> Setup >> System >>
Alternate/Modified Forms and Reports and get the results you expect to get
when you select Microsoft Dynamics GP from the product drop-down list. If you
can find such workstation, either:
a) copy the FORMS.DIC and/or REPORTS.DIC to the server, or
b) point the server to the path indicated in the DYNAMICS.SET file on the
working machine.
Best regards,
--
MG.-
Mariano Gomez, MIS, MCP, PMP
Maximum Global Business, LLC
http://www.maximumglobalbusiness.com
The Dynamics GP Blogster at http://dynamicsgpblogster.blogspot.com
by SQL Server DataBase I am close to completing the consolidation of various small Access databases and a couple of Excel spreadsheets that my little company uses (5 staff) into an Assistant (1) SQL Server 2005 (1) SQL Server 2008 (1) SQL Server (1) MySQL (1) Windows XP (1) Access 2.0 (1) Visual Studio (1) Wow, what a brilliant article! That this database?" on the next step. I am struggling with the fundamentals of SQL Server databases. Is it a single file like an .mdb file? Where does it get reside? Is db all over the world? I had a bit of a trial run a few months back at splitting this database and playing around with the sharing options and could not secure connection. If you have an IT department at your disposal, then I often suggest windows terminal services. This means once the infrastructure is setup, then you can deploy and use you set up the shares so the user can use them. For Access, creating new databases is done from Access, and setting up network database shares in done from Windows Explorer: For SQL Server, it is done from Enterprise Manger, or Visual Studio, or using The only difference is that the "SERVER" service is included and started by default on Windows: the "SQL SERVER" service you had to download and install. Wherever you want it. The
that is not possible. The options I can think of at this point are: 1. Windows SharePoint Services - We could move the db to SharePoint (converting tables to lists, etc.) if They're open to the idea of virtualizing a Mac OS X Server to run Windows Server if it is just for hosting the data. They would also consider running virtual Server Pages - This would take some development, and they'd still need to have a Windows Server or operating system to put the Access database on, correct? Any options I am you do in this situation? Any suggestions and thoughts would be most appreciated. Access Discussions Windows SharePoint Services (1) MySQL (1) Windows Server (1) SharePoint (1) Access 2010 (1) Office (1) Python (1) Linux (1) Well, Access s a RDP client for mac but you will want to check it out first. Windows Terminal Server and Citrix for the Mac clients. It would be expensive, approximately $100 per workstation for TS + Citrix CALs plus the windows server. But would allow you to work with Windows apps on the Mac. FWIW someone once wrote a DOS based RDP client. I could
Connect to multiple SQL Server databases DataBase I currently have multiple access databases that are linked to different access databases also. Because of performance issues (i.e. servers in different locations), I am going to convert these access databases to access projects. So I wanted to know if I will be able to link to different SQL Server databases? And if so is it possible to do this through code, because this will be server at a time. Of course, you can also make your own queries to any databases using ADO and a proper connection string or you can etablish a linked server. Of course, there is also this subtle distinction between multiple databases on the same server or on different server. I never worked with ADP against multiple databases located on the same server; so I cannot tell if you will or not encounter
which support 100 percent functionality, include 32- bit versions of IE7, IE8, and Firefox on Windows. Level 2 browsers are IE7 and IE8 x64, Safari, Firefox on other platforms. Level 2 Basic for Applications (1) SharePoint (1) Access 2007 (1) Access 2010 (1) Office 2003 (1) Windows 7 (1) Well, the question is do you really need to go to all that the other hand if you start developing in asp.net, then you will need a windows based web server to run "Internet services" (in place of the Apahce web server for the one standard for that phone and make GOOD money. The same goes for the windows desktop: it is a standard you can write your software too and sell into a and development process so that we can go from customer to customer without spending three months to learning some new web platform (or database server) for EVERY But that is a because IIS is just not viable as a web server exposed directly to the Internet. Windows web hosts are more expensive and less plentiful than your usual LAMP hosting providers, and standpoint of its architecture). It would be nice if Sharepoint server could be decoupled from Windows and IIS and utilize any reasonable database server as its data store. I know that month. I needed + wanted ms SQL server, so I switch up (same provider) to a windows web site. It was only about $2 more. I think every major web hosting provider
Could anybody generalize the big issues? - - PeteCresswell Access Discussions SQL Server (1) Virtual PC (1) Windows XP (1) Visual Studio 2010 (1) SharePoint (1) Access 2010 (1) Office 2010 (1) Access new version of VBA of course is also runs on the 32 bit version of windows. -> Database triggers and stored procedures: New for 2010 in jet is table events and table But that is the only version most people should be running, even on 64-bit Windows. - - David W. Fenton http: / / www.dfenton.com / usenet at dfenton dot com http: / / www.dfenton code runs seemingly much faster than 32bit code on 64bit processors. I can understand that Windows API code would need refactoring, but to be able to take VBA and run it reason, some people may find it convenient to install 32-bit programs on 64-bit Windows so it can continue to be compatible with other 32-bit programs. So I am at least 5 years). We're still very early in the transition to 64-bit Windows, with a lot of machines still selling that are not 64-bit capable. For the access). It was also happening at the same time as the conversion from DOS to Windows, so there were a lot of different issues adding baggage to help maintain the 16 early. When I am doing quotes for clients' new PCs, I am specifying 64-bit Windows, but not 64-bit software. This has two benefits: Unfortunately, for AccDE it is compiled